Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

Discussion in 'Denied' started by Katie<3, Jul 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mrmagoo

    mrmagoo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Lol why the fudge are you posting a sub application when you just came back today??? i didnt even see you on the server. -,-
     
  2. Lost Darkness

    Lost Darkness New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Seconded.
     
  3. Katie<3

    Katie<3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    You know. You can all just shut your little whiney mouths and stop turning me into the bad girl. It isn't original. I've seen it done way to much. Go bathe in your bath of self-satisfaction and get of my back. Sorry for failing you.


    Also: Fuck you Light. t(-_-)
     
  4. Kaiden

    Kaiden Administrator Community Manager

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    4,845
    Likes Received:
    774
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    /golfclap
     
  5. Zeke

    Zeke [BB] Sub Admin Sub Admin

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    4,209
    Likes Received:
    12
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    True admin material.
     
  6. Stanley Kowalski

    Stanley Kowalski New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Congratulations on destroying what little chance you had at becoming a sub-admin.
     
  7. Light Yagami

    Light Yagami New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    You didn't fail us as we had no expectations.

    Oh and for the record it's a bit of an oxymoron calling us whiney when your retreating and attempting to insult us to regain your lost pride, you also remind me much of your sister.

    Im being nicer than last time, last time me and Evander ripped you apart so don't make me do it again.

    Siamese Twins perhaps, it explains the one leg.
     
  8. mrmagoo

    mrmagoo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    t(-_-)

    Didnt your "sister" use that when she wasnt banned yet?
     
  9. Katie<3

    Katie<3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Light. Stop trolling and hiding behind your big words. This is all you have been doing since you posted in here. I plainly labeled at the top: No usless flaming. You come along and seem to love to cause controversy.

    And I've seen t(-_-) used in many places on the internet. So not one person could be using that.
     
  10. Zeke

    Zeke [BB] Sub Admin Sub Admin

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    4,209
    Likes Received:
    12
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Noobie loved that word troll.

    Also, really? I've only seen t(-_-) used by Noobie.
     
  11. Stanley Kowalski

    Stanley Kowalski New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    I have seen (-_-) used but never t(-_-). Not until Noobie showed up. And yes, Noobie also loved throwing the word "troll" around.
     
  12. Light Yagami

    Light Yagami New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    I'm not trolling, it's constructive criticism, and if you don't understand these "big" words then you prbably don't have the intelligence to "run" the server (Sorry if it's a bit harsh).

    I also believe your sister accused everyone of trolling and flaming.

    Oh and this '(-_-) is what it's supposed to be.

    It's only controversy when a large number of people on both sides are argueing.


    I'm surprised you understood controversy considering it's such a big word.
     
  13. Boilrig

    Boilrig BB Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Light, stop trolling

    My comment is, spend some more time with the community, and get to know everyone better.
     
  14. Katie<3

    Katie<3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Ever since I came to the forums you people have been accusing me of being Noobie. Her IP is 69.253.253.133. Her real name is Jenny McWilliams. Need any more proof. Ask her herself: [email protected] . Oh: And if you think that is my email mine is [email protected] which is plainly on my forum profile.

    Also Light. It is trolling. You are trying to stir up trouble whille making yourself look like the smartest person. Ever hear of deoxyribonucleic acid? Well in yours the inter-street smarts of an epileptic squirrel is encoded. Go read your comics little boy.
     
  15. Stanley Kowalski

    Stanley Kowalski New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    ah yeah, I forgot, it's impossible to have more than one email address.

    Quite possibly the most hilarious attempt at trying to sound smart ever. Holy shit. I'm going to go get a drink.
     
  16. Light Yagami

    Light Yagami New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    It's all been completely constructive and could be used for Katie to better herself, she could I have only insulted her when she's insulted me, have I once sworn at her?
    No.

    I've even apologized when I've said something that could be offensive so sorry if Im the one trolling, im being considerate and trying NOT to flame.

    Okay.

    You know what DNA is well done, now im annoyed.

    Time to overpower you with intelligence!

    Epileptic squirrels cant exist they don't have the correct Genes and even the sequences wouldn't be able to occur, and im definently the little boy insulting people on the internet attempting get into a community after messing up before, go read the book of life little girl you may ind something of use which could stop you from being a failure on the internet to a regular failure in reality.

    Good.Day.
     
  17. mrmagoo

    mrmagoo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    She must like all this attention.
     
  18. Boilrig

    Boilrig BB Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    That's a sad comeback
     
  19. Biff Johnston

    Biff Johnston <MARQUEE><h1 style="color:Green">[BB] Grand Master

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    5
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]
    ^^
    My thoughts on this whole thread
     
  20. Katie&lt;3

    Katie&lt;3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: [UNAPPROOVED]Katie's Application for the Sub-Admin

    Mmmmm. Good old trolling. I'm getting sick of you hiding behind your wall. I love it when people make themselves look high and mighty to get away with COMPLETE AND USELESS FLAMING. Oh wait. I forgot. You love to call it 'constructive criticism'.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.